THE SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY OF ULTRASOUND FOR THE DIAGNOSIS OF CARPAL TUNNEL SYNDROME: A META-ANALYSIS
Filed under Diagnoses
Fowler, J. R., Gaughan J. P., & Ilyas, A.M. (2011). The sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound for the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome: A meta-analysis. Clinical Orthopedics and Related Research, 469(4), 1089-1094.
The Skinny –The authors sought out to determine the sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound therapy for the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome using three scenarios. 1.) using all studies regardless of reference standard 2.) using all studies with electrodiagnostic as the reference standards and 3.) using all studies with clinical diagnosis as the gold standard.
In the Weeds – The authors found a total of 19 articles that were included in the review. Remember, sensitivity indicates a true positive rate and specificity indicates a true-negative rate.
They found the sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound was 77.6% (71.6%-83.6%) and 86.8% (78.9%-94.8%), respectively.
They found the sensitivity and specificity of electrodiagnostic testing to be 80.2% (71.3-89.0) and 78.7% (66.4-91.1, respectively).
Bringing it Home– Ultrasound showed a higher specificity but electrodiagnostic had a slightly higher sensitivity. Although ultrasound may not replace electrodiagnostic testing as the most sensitive tool for diagnosing carpal tunnel, it may be a feasible alternative to electrodiagnostic testing as a first line confirmatory test.
Overall a very nicely done study however it was not without its limitation. There was a lack of heterogeneity among the studies reviewed. Both, ultrasound and electrodiagnostic testing it very operator dependent. The upside of ultrasound is it can be performed very quickly, it is often less expensive, and off course it is essentially pain-free.
–
More To Read
Risk Factors for Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS) in Patients with Hand Trauma
Hand Trauma and CRPS in patients attending Hand Therapy By Tristany Hightower Savaş, S., İnal, E. E., Yavuz, D. D., Uslusoy, F., Altuntaş, S. H., & Aydın, M. A. (2018). Risk factors for complex regional pain syndrome in patients with surgically treated traumatic injuries attending hand therapy. Journal of Hand Therapy, 31(2), 250–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jht.2017.03.007 The…
INTEROSSEOUS MUSCLE TIGHTNESS TESTING
May 2012 No. 19 INTEROSSEOUS MUSCLE TIGHTNESS TESTING Judy Colditz, OT/L, CHT, FAOTA INTEROSSEOUS MUSCLE TIGHTNESS TESTING – ARE YOU DOING IT CORRECTLY? The common term “Intrinsic Tightness Testing” is a misnomer as it describes a maneuver specifically designed to test tightness of the interosseous muscles. The interosseous muscles are small, short-fibered muscles contained within…
What is the Effectiveness of IASTM?
Citation Kim, J., Sung, D. J., Lee, J. (2017). Therapeutic effectiveness of instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization for soft tissue injury: Mechanisms and practical application. Journal of Exercise Rehabilitation, 13(1). doi: https://doi.org/10.12965/jer.1732824.412 The skinny IASTM is a relatively simple technique that uses the surface of an instrument to minimize the amount of pressure or force needed…
How to Use Translation for Improving Fine Motor Skills after a Hand Injury:
I’m always looking for new therapy ideas. I want to keep my patients interested and engaged in therapy. I also want to keep things functional and task oriented. So much of what we do with our hands is about fine motor coordination and dexterity, and that is so hard to duplicate in a clinic setting.…
Sign-up to Get Updates Straight to Your Inbox!
Sign up with us and we will send you regular blog posts on everything hand therapy, notices every time we upload new videos and tutorials, along with handout, protocols, and other useful information.