THE SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY OF ULTRASOUND FOR THE DIAGNOSIS OF CARPAL TUNNEL SYNDROME: A META-ANALYSIS

Fowler, J. R., Gaughan J. P., & Ilyas, A.M. (2011).  The sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound for the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome: A meta-analysis.  Clinical Orthopedics and Related Research, 469(4), 1089-1094.

The Skinny –The authors sought out to determine the sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound therapy for the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome using three scenarios. 1.) using all studies regardless of reference standard 2.) using all studies with electrodiagnostic as the reference standards and 3.)  using all studies with clinical diagnosis as the gold standard. 

In the Weeds – The authors found a total of 19 articles that were included in the review.   Remember, sensitivity indicates a true positive rate and specificity indicates a true-negative rate. 

They found the sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound was 77.6% (71.6%-83.6%) and 86.8% (78.9%-94.8%), respectively. 

They found the sensitivity and specificity of electrodiagnostic testing to be 80.2% (71.3-89.0) and 78.7% (66.4-91.1, respectively).

Bringing it Home– Ultrasound showed a higher specificity but electrodiagnostic had a slightly higher sensitivity.  Although ultrasound may not replace electrodiagnostic testing as the most sensitive tool for diagnosing carpal tunnel, it may be a feasible alternative to electrodiagnostic testing as a first line confirmatory test.

Overall a very nicely done study however it was not without its limitation.  There was a lack of heterogeneity among the studies reviewed.  Both, ultrasound and electrodiagnostic testing it very operator dependent. The upside of ultrasound is it can be performed very quickly, it is often less expensive, and off course it is essentially pain-free. 

Leave a Comment






More To Read

Prevention and Management of Upper Extremity injuries in Modern Mass Production

November 3, 2024

Injuries and Upper Extremty Pitts, G., Custer, M., Foister, R. D., & Uhl, T. (2021). The hand therapist’s role in the preventionand management of upper extremity injuries in the modern mass production industrial setting.Journal of Hand Therapy, 34(2), 237–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jht.2021.04.019 By: Kaylen Kallander The Skinny: This study included four case studies to determine the impact…

Read More

Cyclist Injuries: Avoiding Hand Injuries and Treatment Strategies

July 9, 2022

RAPID REVIEW Chiaramonte, R., Pavone, P., Musumeci, G., Di Rosa, M., & Vecchio, M. (2022).  Preventive strategies, exercises, and rehabilitation of hand neuropathy in cyclists: A systematic review. Journal of Hand Therapy, 35, 164-173.  The Skinny: The study was a systematic review done to get clarification on the diagnostic process for cyclist injury specifically for…

Read More

Assessing and Improving Grip with the Squegg

August 30, 2020

Assessing and Improving Grip with the Squegg By: Megan Prather “Grip training is made fun” In hand therapy we are always looking for engaging new interventions to use with patients. The Squegg is a dynamic grip-training tool that can be used with clients both to assess grip strength and to improve strength across sessions. This…

Read More

Which is better: Splinting the MCP or PIP joint when managing Trigger Finger?

June 2, 2019

Teo, S. H., Ng D. C., Wong, Y.K.(2018).  Effectiveness of proximal interphalangeal joint blocking orthosis vs metacarpophalangeal joint blocking orthosis in trigger digit: A randomized clinical trial. Journal of Hand Therapy, 1-7. The Skinny- This study compared PIP joint immobilization via an Oval-8TM with a custom MCP blocking trigger finger orthosis treatment.  In the Weeds…

Read More
Envelope_1

Sign-up to Get Updates Straight to Your Inbox!

Sign up with us and we will send you regular blog posts on everything hand therapy, notices every time we upload new videos and tutorials, along with handout, protocols, and other useful information.