THE SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY OF ULTRASOUND FOR THE DIAGNOSIS OF CARPAL TUNNEL SYNDROME: A META-ANALYSIS
Filed under Diagnoses
Fowler, J. R., Gaughan J. P., & Ilyas, A.M. (2011). The sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound for the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome: A meta-analysis. Clinical Orthopedics and Related Research, 469(4), 1089-1094.
The Skinny –The authors sought out to determine the sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound therapy for the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome using three scenarios. 1.) using all studies regardless of reference standard 2.) using all studies with electrodiagnostic as the reference standards and 3.) using all studies with clinical diagnosis as the gold standard.
In the Weeds – The authors found a total of 19 articles that were included in the review. Remember, sensitivity indicates a true positive rate and specificity indicates a true-negative rate.
They found the sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound was 77.6% (71.6%-83.6%) and 86.8% (78.9%-94.8%), respectively.
They found the sensitivity and specificity of electrodiagnostic testing to be 80.2% (71.3-89.0) and 78.7% (66.4-91.1, respectively).
Bringing it Home– Ultrasound showed a higher specificity but electrodiagnostic had a slightly higher sensitivity. Although ultrasound may not replace electrodiagnostic testing as the most sensitive tool for diagnosing carpal tunnel, it may be a feasible alternative to electrodiagnostic testing as a first line confirmatory test.
Overall a very nicely done study however it was not without its limitation. There was a lack of heterogeneity among the studies reviewed. Both, ultrasound and electrodiagnostic testing it very operator dependent. The upside of ultrasound is it can be performed very quickly, it is often less expensive, and off course it is essentially pain-free.
–
More To Read
Prevention and Management of Upper Extremity injuries in Modern Mass Production
Injuries and Upper Extremty Pitts, G., Custer, M., Foister, R. D., & Uhl, T. (2021). The hand therapist’s role in the preventionand management of upper extremity injuries in the modern mass production industrial setting.Journal of Hand Therapy, 34(2), 237–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jht.2021.04.019 By: Kaylen Kallander The Skinny: This study included four case studies to determine the impact…
IFC vs TENS: Electrical Stimulation for Pain and Swelling
In this article we’re looking at the difference between Inferential Current versus Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation (IFC vs TENS). Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation (TENS) TENS variations are often described by their technical characteristics: high frequency, low intensity (conventional TENS) or low frequency, high intensity (acupuncture-like TENS, AL-TENS) (Walsh et al., 2009). How TENS Addresses Pain:…
How to Improve HEP Adherence for Optimal Rehabilitation Outcomes
By Sophia Grimm A lack of adherence to home exercise programs in rehabilitation is a significant problem, with nonadherence estimates as high as 30-65% for general musculoskeletal conditions. This could have potentially detrimental effects on patients’ clinical rehabilitation outcomes as the success of certain medical interventions depends largely on patient adherence to advice and prescribed rehabilitation…
EDS 101: Understanding Hypermobility in the Hand Therapy Setting
EDS in the Hand Therapy Setting General Overview:Ehlers Danlos Syndrome (EDS) is a group of heritable connective tissue disorders caused bygenetic changes that affect collagen production, the protein responsible for strength and elasticityin skin, ligaments and tendons (The Ehlers Danlos Society, 2016). There are thirteen forms of EDS that each have their own set of…
Sign-up to Get Updates Straight to Your Inbox!
Sign up with us and we will send you regular blog posts on everything hand therapy, notices every time we upload new videos and tutorials, along with handout, protocols, and other useful information.