Article Review: Trapeziectomy and LRTI: What can patients with CMC osteoarthritis expect 12 months after the procedure?

Janakiramanan, N., Miles, O., Collon, S., Crammond, B., McCombe, D., & Tham, S. K. (2021). Functional Recovery Following Trapeziectomy and Ligament Reconstruction and Tendon Interposition (Trapeziectomy and LRTI): A Prospective Longitudinal Study. The Journal of hand surgery, S0363-5023(21)00304-X. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2021.04.036

The skinny:

Patients with trapeziometacarpal (TMC) osteoarthritis who are candidates for a trapeziectomy and ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition (LRTI) often receive preoperative counseling. Hence, they understand what their recovery (LRTI surgery recovery) and level of function will most likely look like after they undergo the procedure. This was a prospective study aimed to determine the functional recovery of patients who undergo the procedure using the flexor carpi radialis tendon (FCR) for the first 12 months post-operation to provide better education and counseling for future candidates (trapeziectomy recovery). 

In the Weeds:

The study included 55 LRTI Surgery Patient Reviews with TMC osteoarthritis whose symptoms were not alleviated with conservative treatment (splinting and NSAIDs) for at least 3 months. Patients were not included if they already have previous TMC surgeries, other procedures done to the thumb/hand in conjunction with the trapeziectomy and LRTI and if they had arthritis due to chronic autoimmune conditions. Pre-operation, each patient filled out a DASH and Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) to determine functional use of the hand. Thumb opposition, palmar abduction, radial abduction, grip strength, and pinch strength were all measured pre-operation as well as their Kapandji score. Lastly, pain was assessed using a 10-point visual analogue scale. After the patients underwent the procedure, they were all casted for 2 weeks then received a thermoplastic orthosis for the following 4 weeks. Patients’ functional and objective outcomes were reassessed at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months post-operation. 

Bringing it Home:

Compared to baseline measurements, all patient-reported measures (DASH, PRWE) showed significant improvements at the 3, 6, and 9-month follow-up. The DASH and PRWE scores plateaued at 9 months but at the 12-month follow-up patients’ pain scores had significantly improved and 84% had a pain score of 2 or less and 36% reported no pain. Four patients reported a pain score of 3 or more due to FCR tendonitis that was resolved with a cortisone injection after the study was completed. 

Kapandji scores had declined at the 3-month follow-up but had reached preoperative scores by 6 months. There were no significant improvements at the 9 and 12-month follow-ups. 

Palmar abduction significantly improved from preoperative measurements at 3 months and continued to make improvements until the 9 month follow-up. Radial abduction significantly improved from baseline by the 6 month follow-up but no further improvements were made after. 

lrti surgery patient reviews

Power grip strength decreased at 3 months but significantly improved from baseline values at the 6 months and 9-month follow-up. Key pinch significantly decreased at the 3-month check but returned to preoperative measurements by 6 months. Tip pinch also decreased at 3 months but significantly improved from baseline measurements at the 12-month follow-up. 

Rating: 4/5

The findings of this study can be utilized by surgeons and hand therapists to educate patients on the potential outcomes of the trapeziectomy and LRTI within the first year post-operation. The study’s limitations include the small sample size and short follow-up of 12 months. The functional benefits of the procedure beyond one year cannot be concluded from this study alone. 

Leave a Comment






More To Read

Biceps Tenodesis Versus Tenotomy During Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair

October 8, 2022

Article Review By: Delaney Wright Title: Outcomes of Biceps Tenodesis Versus Tenotomy During Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: An Analysis of Patients From a Large Multicenter Database Reference: Srinivasan, R. C., Hao, K. A., Wright, T. W., Farmer, K. W., Wright, J. O., Roach, R. P., Moser, M. W., Freidl, M. C., Pazik, M., & King,…

Read More

How to Improve HEP Adherence for Optimal Rehabilitation Outcomes

February 21, 2021

By Sophia Grimm A lack of adherence to home exercise programs in rehabilitation is a significant problem, with nonadherence estimates as high as 30-65% for general musculoskeletal conditions. This could have potentially detrimental effects on patients’ clinical rehabilitation outcomes as the success of certain medical interventions depends largely on patient adherence to advice and prescribed rehabilitation…

Read More

The Role of Sensory Re-education After Nerve Injury

May 9, 2021

Priya, B. A. (2012). Effectiveness of Sensory Re-education after Nerve Repair (Median or Ulnar Nerve) at the Wrist Level. Indian Journal of Physiotherapy & Occupational Therapy, 6(3), 62–68. The Skinny  The human nervous system is incredibly complex and, once damaged, requires significant time to repair. A previous study (Bentzel, K 2002)  identifies that with peripheral…

Read More

When should you use a Static Progressive Splint in Hand Therapy?

February 2, 2020

Flowers, K. (2002). A proposed decision hierarchy for splinting the stiff joint, with an emphasis on force application parameters. Journal of Hand Therapy, 15, 158–162. The Skinny- The article proposes a decision hierarchy to determine when you should apply a static progressive or dynamic orthosis.  The decision hierarchy uses a modified Weeks test (MWT). The…

Read More
Envelope_1

Sign-up to Get Updates Straight to Your Inbox!

Sign up with us and we will send you regular blog posts on everything hand therapy, notices every time we upload new videos and tutorials, along with handout, protocols, and other useful information.